LSU season outlook; UNC pick

I’ve been hesitating to lay down predictions for LSU’s season because in my mind a lot is riding on the opener here in Atlanta tomorrow night, and until today we didn’t have a clear picture of what kind of North Carolina team the Tigers will be facing.

Turns out, it’s the Tarheels’ Junior Varsity.

I’m not predicting LSU will lose this game, but in the back of my mind I can’t help thinking about what complete chaos the program would spiral into if we did. Anything short of absolutely lighting up what remains of the UNC defense and I’ll be questioning things, but if we lose this one … man.

But I think Les Miles and Gary Crowton are smart enough (no, really) to see the situation here. You’ve promised a high-powered offense after a disastrous 2009 and now you’ve got no excuse not to deliver in the opener. Any temptation to go easy on the ‘Heels has to be put aside in the name of putting up big numbers. And I think that’ll happen.

Big nights by Jefferson, Shepard and Randle. Defensively we’ll shut down a weakened version of a weak UNC offense.

LSU 38 – 20

So on to the season as a whole. Before anybody has played a snap, there are only three games I feel confident calling a victory for – Vandy, McNeese, ULM. I suspect we’ll be a better team than Mississippi State and Tennessee. But we almost lost to MSU last year, so I want to see them against Memphis and Auburn before I make a pick for our game. The Vols have extremely low expectations, so let’s see if that’s validated against Oregon and Florida.

Right now I would lean toward us beating West Virginia and Ole Miss. And I would lean toward us losing to Alabama and Florida. Auburn and Arkansas are wildcards at the moment. Outside of Vandy, there’s nobody on our SEC schedule who I’d feel confident projecting a bad season for. And outside of Bama and Florida, nobody I would project as especially strong.

Arkansas and Auburn have potential to be very good. MSU and UT have low expectations and could be better than projected. And Ole Miss – well who knows? Masoli will play and might not even get arrested again before November. We’ll have clarity in about a month, but right now there’s a lot of haze in the SEC outlook.

For now, then, I’ll say LSU fails to deliver an upside surprise and loses to both Alabama and Florida. And we split Auburn and Arkansas; beating one of those two. The optimistic outlook beyond that is we beat Ole Miss, MSU Tennessee and West Virginia. That is to say – the team we only came close to beating last year because Dexter McCluster dove out of the way of an onside kick; the team it took Chad Jones’ superpowers to beat last year; the team Les Miles blew a 21-point lead to in his very first game in Tiger Stadium and a potentially-explosive team we’re unfamiliar with. Too much bad joo-joo for me to project a sweep of those four.

Hey – I’m projecting 8-4! Awesome. Of course there’s room for an upside swing from that. I wish the UNC game was one I could draw some conclusions out of, but without their starting defense it won’t be. Unless the results are poor (i.e. we lose or barely skate by), this weekend and next weekend against Vandy won’t tell us much. Depending on how they look, MSU could give some clues, but we face the potential to be an untested and over-confident 5-0 team heading in to Florida if MSU, WV and UT aren’t better than projected.

This well could be a season divided; 5-0 to start, 3-4 to finish. We’ll see.

Posted in College Football, LSU Football, Les Miles | Leave a comment

Preview of Alabama’s Nike Pro Combat Uniforms

Nike will unveil its 2010 NCAA Pro Combat uniforms this morning at 10, and Nike is doing a better job this year of keeping information under wraps. What I know so far:

- Alabama will wear them against Mississippi State on Nov. 13
- Their design is called “The Next Wave”
- The jersey numbers will be “coded” with a Houndstooth check
- The helmet will have a Houndstooth stripe
- Crimson jersey; white pants with a “truncated” crimson stripe. “A” logo on the pants
- There will also be an American flag on the jersey, as they are wearing it after Veteran’s Day
- Glove fingers will have Discipline, Commitment, Toughness, Effort and Pride written on them

Update - The Bama uniform in all its “glory”:
Alabama Nike Pro Combat Uniform

Alabama’s uniform changes are obviously the big question, what with the tradition and all. But Florida’s doing it again this year as well. Their workup will be:

- Worn vs. Georgia October 30
- Called “Threatened By No One”
- Features a “bold gator-skin pattern” throughout the uniform. (Nike says its designers “found parallels between the animal’s ruthlessness and Florida’s swift, aggressive game.” Gee, really? I don’t think anybody has ever thought of that before)
- Both the helmet and the uniform will have the gator-skin. The helmet will be orange with the traditional Gators script; the jersey blue

Update - The gator-skinneriffic Florida getup:
Florida Nike Pro Combat Uniform

Posted in Media, Money | 2 Comments

SEC Coaching Staff Structures

It’s no secret that I’m a fan of the Dedicated Defensive Coordinator position – having a guy in charge of the defense who isn’t also asked to be a position coach. Bo Pelini was a DDC in 2007 at LSU; Will Muschamp was a DDC in 2003 at LSU. Those were rather good years for the Tigers, what with the national championships and No. 1 (2003) and No. 3 (2007) defenses.

We no longer have a DDC. In 2008, of course, we had no defensive coordinator – just two guys trying to do that one job plus coach positions. And how we have John Chavis, who disturbingly also has the responsibility of coaching the single most problematic position for LSU this year – linebackers. At linebacker, the Tigers have a stud in Kelvin Sheppard then a bunch of guys with little to no college linebacker experience. And one of the two guys who aren’t redshirt freshmen currently has a broken jaw.

Chavis has a tough job just with the linebacker corps this season. But he also has to devise schemes to counter everything from Ryan Mallet’s arm to Mark Ingram’s legs (plus all the Wildcats and Spreads in between) and teach the defensive as a unit to run them. A tall order that’ll make it a challenge to improve on last year’s No. 26 Total Defense rank.

Thinking about Chavis’ tasks and longing for a DDC made me curious about the structure of coaching staffs across the SEC. If you’re not aware, a team has a head coach and up to nine assistant coaches (and two graduate assistants). Digging into the media guides revealed some interesting pictures of how those nine assistant-coach positions are structured:

- Offensively, coaching staff structures are remarkably consistent. Every school in the SEC except Arkansas has five offensive assistants. All SEC teams have a quarterbacks coach, a running backs coach, a wide receivers coach and an offensive line coach. All but Arkansas have a dedicated tight ends coach (Florida’s tight ends coach also coaches fullbacks), which seems a little strange. With just nine assistant spots, dedicating one to tight ends is a big investment of resources for a position that is somewhere between a receiver an a lineman and typically not a really key role. But six tight end coaches also work on special teams, so in a lot of cases more value is coming from that spot.

- Nobody has a Dedicated Offensive Coordinator, and nine out of 12 schools have an OC who also coaches quarterbacks. And that makes sense – the quarterback executes the offense and you’re coaching just one or two guys. Quarterbacks coach is almost an extension of Offensive Coordinator. Only Tennessee and Florida have OCs who aren’t also the quarterbacks coach. South Carolina has no Offensive Coordinator. Ole Miss is the only school rocking the horrible idea of “Co-Coordinators”.

- Defensive staff structure is all over the place. Ten SEC schools have a single defensive line coach, but Arkansas and Vandy separate that out into defensive tackle and defensive end coaches. Ten schools also have a single linebacker coach, but Arkansas and Georgia break that out into inside and outside linebacker coaches. Seven schools have a single defensive backs coach while five have separate coaches for cornerbacks and safeties.

- Three SEC schools (Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee) have Dedicated Defensive Coordinators. Five defensive coordinators have linebacker position responsibilities, and four coach defensive backfield players. Florida and Mississippi State have guys called “Co-Defensive Coordinator”, but they also have a Defensive Coordinator without the “Co-” part, so it seems like one guy is in charge.

- All teams except Mississippi State have a guy tagged as “Special Teams Coordinator”, but only LSU has a Dedicated Special Teams Coordinator – though we’re told Joe Robinson is also “working with the defensive line” and he’s secondarily called the “Defensive Line Assistant”. Not “Defensive Line Assistant Coach”, just “assistant”.

- Five teams now have a guy tagged as “Passing Game Coordinator” or “Running Game Coordinator”.

What does all this mean? Hell if I know. I assume coaches who have been around a while have a good sense of how to divide the nine jobs. And I assume Les Miles doesn’t know anything about that. He replaced Bo Pelini with Joe Robinson, after all.

I’d try to make the case that defense is more complicated and therefore should be the side with five coaches, but the only SEC team set up like that – Arkansas – had the conference’s worst defense last year. But then again, Arkansas is the only team without a tight ends coach, but their tight end D.J. Williams was second in the SEC in tight-end receiving yards. So go figure.

I do think a Dedicated Defensive Coordinator is a smart move, so I’d start there with my imaginary staff. And an Offensive Coordinator who coaches quarterbacks makes sense, so there’s another. Running backs, wide receivers and offensive line coaches are obvious choices as well and give me five guys.

On defense, I’m not sure I see the general benefit of splitting up any of the jobs (line, linebackers, backfield). Yes, defensive end is a different job than defensive tackle, outside linebacker different than inside linebacker and cornerback different than safety. But they are all units sharing a task, so having one line coach would seem to have advantages over having one guy coaching the middle and one guy coaching the ends. And the need for two coaches for a unit seems situational. This year, for example, it would be great if LSU had another linebackers coach.

So I’d do this: position coaches for defensive backfield, linebackers and defensive line, plus a Defensive Skills coach whose job would be to work on technique across the defense. Maybe one season he focuses on a young linebacker corps, another he changes focus week to week based on issues from the last game. He could also handle special teams, and maybe even talk to the tight ends from time to time.

It would look like this:

Cap’n Ken’s Staff
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator
- Defensive Backs Coach
- Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Line Coach
- Defensive Skills Coach / Special Teams Coordinator

Or something like that.

As for the actual staffs, the team-by-team rundown is:

Alabama
- Offensive Coordinator/Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator
- Defensive Backs Coach
- Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Line Coach
It should be noted that before this season, Kirby Smart had position responsibilities (defensive backs) in addition to his DC role. In 2009, Alabama had two linebacker coaches. Saban replaced James Willis (now DC at Texas Tech) with a defensive backs coach; freeing up Smart.

Arkansas
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator / Defensive Backs Coach
- Inside Linebackers Coach
- Outside Linebackers Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Defensive Tackles Coach
- Defensive Line Coach

Auburn
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator / Linebackers Coach
- Cornerbacks Coach
- Safeties Coach
- Defensive Line Coach

Florida
- Offensive Coordinator / Offensive Line Coach
- Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends / Fullbacks Coach
- Defensive Coordinator / Cornerbacks Coach
- Safeties Coach / Co-Defensive Coordinator
- Linebackers Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Defensive Line Coach

Georgia
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach
- Offensive Line Coach / Running Game Coordinator
- Defensive Coordinator / Outside Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Backs Coach
- Inside Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Line Coach / Special Teams Coordinator

Kentucky
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator
- Defensive Backs Coach
- Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Line Coach

LSU
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach / Passing Game Coordinator
- Tight Ends Coach
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator / Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Backs Coach
- Defensive Line Coach
- Special Teams Coordinator / Defensive Line Assistant

Ole Miss
- Co-Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Co-Offensive Coordinator / Offensive Line Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Defensive Coordinator / Linebackers Coach
- Cornerbacks Coach
- Safeties Coach
- Defensive Line Coach

Mississippi State
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach / Passing Game Coordinator
- Tight Ends Coach
- Offensive Line Coach / Running Game Coordinator
- Defensive Coordinator / Linebackers Coach
- Cornerbacks Coach
- Safeties Coach
- Defensive Line Coach / Co-Defensive Coordinator

South Carolina
- Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator / Cornerbacks & Free Safeties Coach
- Spurs & Strong Safeties Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Line Coach

Tennessee
- Offensive Coordinator / Running Backs Coach
- Quarterbacks Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator
- Defensive Backs Coach
- Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Line Coach

Vanderbilt
- Offensive Coordinator / Quarterbacks Coach
- Running Backs Coach
- Wide Receivers Coach
- Tight Ends Coach / Special Teams Coordinator
- Offensive Line Coach
- Defensive Coordinator / Defensive Backs Coach
- Linebackers Coach
- Defensive Tackles Coach
- Defensive Ends Coach

Posted in College Football, LSU Coaches, SEC Coaches | 1 Comment

LSU Football Money – Why Les’ Seat is Hot

Gerry DiNardo didn’t know pressure. Surely he knew you couldn’t lose seven games and then eight games and expect to remain LSU’s head football coach, but he didn’t know real pressure.

In DiNardo’s penultimate year – 1998 – LSU’s Athletic Department budget was about $28 million. The Tiger Athletic Foundation pulled in about $9 million in donations and the SEC handed out just over $5 million to LSU. A sideline-seat season ticket in Tiger Stadium cost $204. DiNardo’s 4-7 record that year didn’t get him fired, but also didn’t get him a raise. He’d still make $585,000 the next year.

Les Miles – he knows pressure.

In the decade between DiNardo’s fatal 2-8 season in 1999 and Miles’ disappointing 9-4 one last year, LSU Athletics – and football as its driver – has become a different beast.

LSU Sports Revenue

The university-set Athletic Department budget has grown to $81 million, and Equity in Athletics data shows total revenue cracked the $100 million mark in 2008-09. The TAF brings in just under $40 million a year. The SEC handed LSU $13 million last year. Miles is the $3.75 million lynchpin of a much, much larger enterprise than DiNardo could have imagined. Note that the chart above is not intended to be an accurate accounting of all revenue; just the growth of the associated revenue channels.

Obviously major college sports has become a huge business over the past decade (Alabama’s athletic budget was also just $35 millon in 1998; they brought in $103 million in 2009). And LSU – thankfully – has fully participated. The Tigers’ athletic program would compare favorably with any in the nation. That LSU wants to be on the Alabama level rather than the South Carolina level – the Cocks had a budget similar to LSU’s in 1998 but “only” generated $76 million in 2008-09 revenue – is a good thing.

But for all the talk of fat SEC TV contracts and BCS bowl payouts, it’s the cash of Tiger fans fueling this machine. Football ticket sales – not counting Tradition Fund contributions – totalled $25.6 million in 2009. LSU budget documents suggest football Tradition Fund contributions brought in another $18.8 million. Cash donations to TAF totalled almost $32 million. Without digging deep, there’s $76 million LSU pulled directly from its fan base last year.

Yes, LSU has expanded Tiger Stadium since 1998. But the tripling in ticket revenue didn’t come from tripling the number of seats. It just costs a lot more to be a Tiger fan now.

The fan who was once sold that sideline season ticket for $204 is now asked to pay at least $900 for the right to buy the ticket for $350. That’s one of the big reasons the athletic department gets by without state funds. The TAF has invested $160 million in new facilities since 2000, and those hefty donations and ticket sales are what the TAF is counting on to pay off its debt. Interest payments alone total more than $4.6 million per year and the foundation has $127 million in outstanding bond debt.

There is a lot of money being given to LSU from fans, and the program needs the money and the facilities to compete with the Alabamas of the world. Nobody wants to pay more for the privilege of sitting in Tiger Stadium, but season tickets are sold out again this season, so the economics still make sense.

There’s also a cycle at work – as LSU has more success, it attracts more dollars. As it has more dollars, it has better facilities and personnel. As it has better facilities and personnel, it attracts better talent. And as it attracts better talent, it has more success. LSU is among the nation’s elite football programs in terms of recent success, dollars, facilities and talent. Personnel – that’s an open question. But we pay them like they are elite.

Money is the key to all of that, which brings us back to Mr. Miles and the pressure atop him.

As has always been the case with coaches, Miles can’t expect to field losing teams and keep his job. But the guy is considered a hot-seat coach despite winning a national championship, delivering two other 11-win seasons and never winning fewer than eight games at LSU. The reason for that may not be obvious, but I think it’s simple. Confidence.

I think I’m like a lot of LSU fans who have never really been all that confident in Miles’ capabilities. He’s won, but his program often seems to be teetering on the brink of disaster. And, in fact, he blew LSU’s shot at the BCS title game in 2007, but managed to Forrest Gump his way into it anyhow. Then, of course, there was the Ole Miss game last year. Maybe more than any single event in Miles’ LSU tenure, that episode was a confidence destroyer. That’s what we’re seeing now – Les hasn’t “lost” on the field, but he’s lost a lot of fan confidence over the past two seasons. The eight-win season, the horrible offense, the quarterback troubles, the Ole Miss meltdown and the Capital One Bowl failure are all adding up now.

Confidence and money have a very close relationship. The “con” in Con Man, after all, stands for “confidence”. When people have confidence in something, they are more willing to buy or invest in that thing. People handed billions over to Bernie Madoff based on nothing but confidence. And LSU fans buy their pricey tickets and donate their hard-earned dollars because of the confidence they have in the program. [ed note: That is not to say that LSU is running a "con game" like Madoff - I'm just illustrating the connection between confidence and money.]

Today, things still seem to be OK. Season tickets are sold out and TAF money is still rolling in. But the stakes these days are huge – when you demand high prices that comes with high expectations. And LSU has become quite dependent on all that money, what with the big operating budget, expectation of being self-supporting, $160 million in facilities to pay off and more in the works.

If Miles continues to erode confidence, that will start to show up in LSU’s and TAF’s bank accounts. And because of the increasingly high stakes, it won’t take losing on the field to put Miles out of a job. It’ll just take the loss of confidence. If the powers in the athletic department and TAF think Miles is a significant drain on contributions, he’ll be gone and a marketable new coach will be brought in to rebuild the confidence – and regain the dollars.

Posted in LSU Football, Les Miles | 1 Comment

Boise State & The Two-Game Season

Ironically, if anything pushes big-time college football more toward a playoff system it could be the rise of Boise State through the traditional human-bias poll system that determines who plays for the BCS Championship. Having crept up through the good-old-boy network of human voters over the past couple of years, Boise finally gets an arbitrary starting position this season – No. 5 in the Coaches Poll – that sets it up for a potential BCS Championship Game appearance.

With No. 1 Alabama and No. 3 Florida meeting at least once, Boise essentially sits at the No. 4 spot to start the season. If No. 2 Ohio State and No. 4 Texas drop a game, the path to Glendale is cleared for Boise – if they go undefeated again.

And therein lies the joke here. Boise rightfully gets credit for scheduling Virginia Tech and Oregon State this season, but beyond those two games the Broncos face nobody. And I mean nobody. Yes, they play in an amazingly weak conference, but when you go from “oh, look at the cute blue field” to “this is a top-five team”, the schedule matters. A lot. They’re playing for the big prize now.

That Boise plays a weak schedule is hardly news. But taking a look at the Rivals 120 (to use a system that ranks all 120 D-1A teams), the schedule-depth disparity between Boise and other top teams is pretty amazing.

I’ll run down a lot of numbers down below, but first let’s look at a chart.
Boise vs. Alabama schedules
This is a plot of the Rivals ratings of Alabama and Boise State’s opponents, ranked from toughest (1st) to easiest (12th). So in the 1st position, Alabama faces Rivals No. 6 Florida and Boise faces Rivals No. 9 Virginia Tech. And in the 12th Alabama faces D-1AA Georgia State (I give a number of 125 to D-1AA teams to separate them a bit) while Boise faces Rivals No. 119 San Jose State.

Beyond the Va. Tech and Oregon State games, Boise plays nobody ranked in the top half of all D-1A teams by Rivals. Boise’s third-toughest game is against Rivals No. 65 Nevada. By contrast, Alabama’s ninth toughest game is against Rivals No. 61 Mississippi State. Boise can’t help that it plays in a conference (this year) where the second-best team is rated No. 65, and Alabama can’t help that it plays in a conference where four of its five division rivals are ranked No. 44 or better. But when the rewards are tied so closely to human opinions, shouldn’t it matter that a team plays little more than glorified scrimmages 10 out of 12 weeks?

Consider this scenario: Say Boise and Oregon (Rivals No. 4 but Coaches No. 11) both beat their toughest and second-toughest opponents – which would include a common opponent in Rivals No. 22 Oregon State. Boise runs the table playing 10 games against Rivals Nos. 65 – 119 while Oregon loses one of the three other games it faces against Rivals Top 40 teams. Or Ohio State beats Rivals No. 8 Iowa and Rivals No. 11 Wisconsin but loses to Rivals No. 16 Miami or Rivals No. 19 Penn State and finishes 11-1. Would any rational person actually say Boise had proven themselves to be the better team?

But that’s the way things could shake out now that Boise has the full favor of human voters. The conventional wisdom is that the human pollsters would put an undefeated Boise team into the BCS title game over a one-loss team near the top. If this were a matter of subtle differences (say Boise played a No. 40 while Ohio State played a No. 30), that would be one thing. But the schedule spread between Boise and the other contenders is startling.

Now for the numbers overload. If we take the Rivals Top 15 as the set in which teams have a reasonable shot at reaching the BCS Championship Game, here’s how the Boise toughest-to-easiest schedule works out:

- Boise has the 12th-hardest “toughest game” against No. 9 Va. Tech. Twelve of the 15 have Top-10 opponents. TCU has the easiest toughest game against No. 22 Oregon State.

- Boise has the 12th-hardest “second-toughest game” against No. 22 Oregon State. Thirteen of the 15 have Top-25 opponents. Nebraska has the easiest second-toughest game against No. 28 Missouri.

- Boise has the easiest “third-toughest game” against No. 65 Nevada. Next closest is Texas against No. 43 Texas A&M. Twelve of the 15 have Top-40 opponents and eight have Top-25 opponents.

- Boise has the easiest “fourth-toughest game” against No. 66 Fresno State. Next closest is Wisconsin against No. 47 Michigan State. Nine of the 15 have Top-40 opponents and four have Top-25 opponents.

- Boise has the easiest “fifth-toughest game” against No. 71 Wyoming. Next closest is TCU against No. 59 SMU. Seven of the 15 have Top-40 opponents.

- Boise has the easiest “sixth-toughest game” against No. 78 Idaho. Next closest is TCU against No. 71 Wyoming. Four of the 15 have Top-40 opponents.

- Boise has the easiest “seventh-toughest game” against No. 86 Hawaii. Next closest is Ohio State against No. 73 Ohio. Pitt has the sole Top-40 matchup (No. 40 Rutgers) and nine of the 15 play Top-60 (i.e. the top half of all D-1A teams).

- Boise has the easiest “eighth-toughest game” against No. 98 Toledo. Next closest is TCU against No. 77 San Diego State. Just five of the 15 play Top-60 teams.

- Boise has the 14th-hardest “ninth-toughest game” against No. 101 La. Tech. TCU is easiest against No. 105 UNLV. Only one team – Oklahoma against No. 56 Oklahoma State – plays a Top-60 team.

- Boise has the 13th-hardest “tenth-toughest game” against No. 103 Utah State. Wisconsin, against No. 105 UNLV and TCU against No. 107 Colorado State have the easiest. Thirteen of the 15 play Bottom-40 teams.

- Boise has the 11th-hardest “eleventh-toughest game” against No. 113 New Mexico State. Fourteen of the 15 play Bottom-40 teams and ten play Bottom-20 teams.

- Boise has the 5th-hardest “twelfth-toughest game” agains No. 119 San Jose State. Ten of the 15 play D-1AA schools and four play Bottom-20 teams. USC has the hardest easiest game against No. 90 Virginia.

This isn’t a case of a bad team or two being on Boise’s schedule. Pretty much everybody’s schedule turns to junk about eight games in, but Boise is playing eighth-game quality teams from their third-toughest game on. And that’s fine – if your team isn’t trying to be taken seriously as a BCS title contender. But now Boise is being taken seriously.

Maybe Boise has Top-5 talent. Maybe they would roll through a playoff. And maybe they’ll end up in the BCS Championship Game this season. But there’s no way they will have earned it if they do.

Posted in Media, Money | 1 Comment